I was doing a bit of research online on the “Indian head wiggle” and failed to find satisfactory literature on the matter. What reason could I, an Indian possibly have, to read about the mechanism you ask? After all, the trait, no matter how incongruous, is instinctual, like that which propels salmon to swim upriver, into the jaws of waiting Grizzlies to spawn, when all common sense (and good instinct) should prevail on the species to swim downriver like other normal intelligent fish. Well I will tell you.
I was reading Shantaram, the second book tailor made for Indophiles (Vikram Seth’s, A Suitable Boy being the other one), and I came across a passage on the head bobble. I wanted to write a review but found someone else who did it perfectly - thank you Phani for encapsulating my all thoughts, only better.
Anyways back to the head wiggling, He explains it as such - “The India head-wiggle, the most characteristic of Indian expressive gestures – was the equivalent of a forward nod of the head, meaning Yes. I’d also discerned the subtler senses of I agree with you, and Yes, I would like that. What I learned on the train, was that there was a Universal message attached to the gesture, when it was used as a greeting, which made it uniquely useful… Gradually, I realized that the wiggle of the head was a signal to others that carried an amiable and disarming message: I am a peaceful man. I don’t mean any harm.” While Mr. Roberts is correct about the first half, extrapolating it to mean “I am a peaceful man or I don’t mean any harm” is like saying Snyder is someone who “cares about football”, while in actuality we all know that he is a prick with too much money who just happens to own a NFL team.
Anyways back to the head wiggling, He explains it as such - “The India head-wiggle, the most characteristic of Indian expressive gestures – was the equivalent of a forward nod of the head, meaning Yes. I’d also discerned the subtler senses of I agree with you, and Yes, I would like that. What I learned on the train, was that there was a Universal message attached to the gesture, when it was used as a greeting, which made it uniquely useful… Gradually, I realized that the wiggle of the head was a signal to others that carried an amiable and disarming message: I am a peaceful man. I don’t mean any harm.” While Mr. Roberts is correct about the first half, extrapolating it to mean “I am a peaceful man or I don’t mean any harm” is like saying Snyder is someone who “cares about football”, while in actuality we all know that he is a prick with too much money who just happens to own a NFL team.
So given the Indian head nod’s legacy as a baffling, oft ridiculed and clearly misunderstood occurrence, I’ve decided to put together the definitive guide to the “Indian head shake”. You heard it here first.
First off, one needs to understand the Indian psyche to understand the head nod. Indian culture espouses “softness” when communicating, by this I mean the avoidance at any cost to directly deny, ask, refuse, refute, etc anything when dealing with strangers/guests. This is the main cause for the existence of this gesture, to “soften” the hard junctures in language where one might be compelled to *gasp* utter phrases like “yes”, “no”,”I want” etc.
Let me give you an example. When visiting someone’s home, it is not customary to ask the host for water "directly", the way one would ask for water in the U.S. For example, the phrase “Could I have some water?” which directly translates in Hindi to “mujhe thoda pani milega?” would generally never be uttered. It would have to be accompanied by a smile and the head bobble… and usually even the whole sentence would not be uttered… it would most likely be a “smile” + “head nod” followed by “thoda pani…” i.e. “smile” + “head nod” + “some water…” which exonerates the speaker from uttering the demanding phrase - “Could I have…”. You follow?
If you understand this… you’ll start to understand why someone wiggles their head when you ask them a question. For example if you ask someone if they liked the chocolates you brought for them… you will get the head wiggle in response. Which might drive my hopelessly direct white brethren batty but in actuality it is the Indian way of saying “Yes, thank you very much… even though I just need to say YES, I feel that it would be too “direct/un-civil” so I am compelled to make this ridiculous motion”. Now that you’re armed with the knowledge, I am confident that the next time you’re in India and someone tells you “straight” and wiggles his head when you ask them for directions, you will not only know why the head is wiggling but also why the “command” word “go” was not added before “straight”. Think of it as a universal laxative. Just like a stool softener, it allows the subject to negotiate uncomfortable/difficult communication barriers easily.
Now my magnanimity is not one sided, I also make sure that every one of my compatriots visiting the U.S. is adequately counseled to decipher every day American “culture” that they might find confusing. For example, a couple of months ago, my previously referenced IIT spawning uncle decided to visit the U.S. The reason being his Phelps emulating, Ivy-league attending, full-scholarship receiving, PhD devouring son of course.
I therefore forearmed him with knowledge of the local customs. I explained to him that in the U.S., Indians are not actually Indian (from India) because Indians are understood to be native Indians or more correctly, Native Americans. At this he seemed shocked… mortified even, and after staring at me for a seconds, indignantly stated that he was NOT a Red Indian; at which point it was my point to be mortified and I made him promise never to utter the phrase “I am not a Red Indian" in the U.S to which he agreed grudgingly. He couldn’t understand what all the fuss was about… after all in his head Columbus discovered the U.S. when he went looking for India and the locals were named after Indians... so he asked, why therefore shouldn't Native Americans be called Red Indians and as an extrapolation, the rest as White Indians? (in his head America only consisted of white people). Why shouldn't Indians be left to their original identity and the other races be named after them!? I sighed; I didn't want to get into a discussion with him about what he thought Indian Indians, American Indians and African Americans ought to be called. But in the future if I do come across someone from the Department of Labor, I would love to have them interact one-on-one with him on this topic.
I therefore forearmed him with knowledge of the local customs. I explained to him that in the U.S., Indians are not actually Indian (from India) because Indians are understood to be native Indians or more correctly, Native Americans. At this he seemed shocked… mortified even, and after staring at me for a seconds, indignantly stated that he was NOT a Red Indian; at which point it was my point to be mortified and I made him promise never to utter the phrase “I am not a Red Indian" in the U.S to which he agreed grudgingly. He couldn’t understand what all the fuss was about… after all in his head Columbus discovered the U.S. when he went looking for India and the locals were named after Indians... so he asked, why therefore shouldn't Native Americans be called Red Indians and as an extrapolation, the rest as White Indians? (in his head America only consisted of white people). Why shouldn't Indians be left to their original identity and the other races be named after them!? I sighed; I didn't want to get into a discussion with him about what he thought Indian Indians, American Indians and African Americans ought to be called. But in the future if I do come across someone from the Department of Labor, I would love to have them interact one-on-one with him on this topic.
Anyways, I had to further explain to him that Indians from India are actually Asian. At the same time he shouldn’t get worried if he gets funny looks when he described himself as Asian because clearly he didn’t look “Oriental/Chinese” and therefore for him to truly explain that he was “Indian”, and not Chinese or Native American he must clarify any misunderstandings he might create by declaring himself as “East Indian”... and if that still elicited a blank response then to deliver the most proper definition: “Indian, dot not feathers”. He wiggled his head as he nodded in understanding. Naturally.